log in | register | forums
Show:
Go:
Forums
Username:

Password:

User accounts
Register new account
Forgot password
Forum stats
List of members
Search the forums

Advanced search
Recent discussions
- Will we see 5.30 released at Wakefield show? (News:)
- Prizes for Wakefield Show announced (News:)
- Heretic update from R-Comp (News:)
- Wakefield Show 2024 is next Saturday (News:)
- Git client updated to 0.07 (News:2)
- Archive Edition 27:1 reviewed (News:)
- Rougol April 2024 meeting on monday is Anniversary time (News:1)
- WROCC April 2024 meeting o...changes to our phone lines (News:1)
- April developer 'fireside' chat is on saturday night (News:)
- March 2024 News Summary (News:4)
Latest postings RSS Feeds
RSS 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.9
Atom 0.3
Misc RDF | CDF
 
View on Mastodon
@www.iconbar.com@rss-parrot.net
Site Search
 
Article archives
The Icon Bar: Programming: GCC 3.0 Release
 
  GCC 3.0 Release
  (18:42 18/6/2001)
  johnstlr (09:29 19/6/2001)
    Phlamethrower (17:46 19/6/2001)
      Gulli (14:58 15/6/2002)
  monkeyson (13:02 27/9/2001)
    johnstlr (13:56 27/9/2001)
      geoff_youngs (17:38 27/9/2001)
 
davidm Message #4776, posted at 18:42, 18/6/2001
Unregistered user The RISC OS version isn't available yet (obviously), but I'm sure Nick Burrett and others are working hard to bring it across.

The list of new features are very impressive (the decreased memory usage when building C++ progs sounds great). You can check them out here :

http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.0/features.html

I'm certainly looking forward to the RISC OS version. Good luck to those guys working on it.

  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
johnstlr Message #4777, posted at 09:29, 19/6/2001, in reply to message #4776
Unregistered user Seconded - the new features do look good. While I don't have the expertise to help with the port I hope they manage it - especially as I'm waiting on a machine to be delivered that will finally make using it feasible (if a little slow)
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Phlamethrower Message #4778, posted at 17:46, 19/6/2001, in reply to message #4777
Unregistered user

* New unified back-end for Arm, Thumb and StrongArm contributed.
* Port of gcc to Intel's XScale processor contributed

Yay!

  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
monkeyson Message #4780, posted at 13:02, 27/9/2001, in reply to message #4776
Unregistered user Can any version of GCC produce modules?
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
johnstlr Message #4781, posted at 13:56, 27/9/2001, in reply to message #4780
Unregistered user
Can any version of GCC produce modules?

No, and as such it's a little short of a development solution for RISC OS. You need the Norcroft compiler for that.

  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
geoff_youngs Message #4782, posted at 17:38, 27/9/2001, in reply to message #4781
Unregistered user
Can any version of GCC produce modules?

No, and as such it's a little short of a development solution for RISC OS. You need the Norcroft compiler for that.

The latest version of which is freely available (albeit with a 60 day licence) from http://www.riscos.com/download/. Also worth a look is a free replacement for CMHG (the header generator for modules written in C) by Robin Watts and Justin Fletcher at http://www.movspclr.co.uk/software/prog.html

  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Gulli Message #4779, posted at 14:58, 15/6/2002, in reply to message #4778
Unregistered user Has anyone heard how the GCC port (v.2.95) is going? It's been at pre-release 3 for quite a while and my fingers are starting to itch for the release version smile

[Edited by Gulli at 22:02, 24/9/2001]
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 

The Icon Bar: Programming: GCC 3.0 Release