log in | register | forums
Show:
Go:
Forums
Username:

Password:

User accounts
Register new account
Forgot password
Forum stats
List of members
Search the forums

Advanced search
Recent discussions
- R-Comp reveals N.Ex.T Boxes - the successor to the i.MX6 (News:)
- RISCOSbits at Wakefield Show 2024 (News:)
- R-Comp releases Genealogy v2 (News:)
- Will we see 5.30 released at Wakefield show? (News:1)
- Sine Nomine updates RiscOSM and Impact (News:)
- Netfetch version 5.55 released (News:)
- Prizes for Wakefield Show announced (News:)
- Heretic update from R-Comp (News:)
- Wakefield Show 2024 is next Saturday (News:)
- Git client updated to 0.07 (News:2)
Latest postings RSS Feeds
RSS 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.9
Atom 0.3
Misc RDF | CDF
 
View on Mastodon
@www.iconbar.com@rss-parrot.net
Site Search
 
Article archives
The Icon Bar: General: ARMini people... Time to let the cat out of the bag!
 
  ARMini people... Time to let the cat out of the bag!
  This is a long thread. Click here to view the threaded list.
 
Steve Fryatt Message #117398, posted by stevef at 23:04, 19/4/2011, in reply to message #117375
Member
Posts: 18
I contacted Steve Fryatt and John-Mark Bell, obtaining necessary permissions, software and source, for just such an occasion smile
Hum. That reads as if I was involved in supplying you with permission to bundle NetSurf. Since I don't recall ever answering the relevant email (due to pre-show organisational workload and the fact that ADSL, along with the related email access, don't work too well along a severed phone line), I'm quite chuffed by that achievement. indiff

(That doesn't mean that you didn't get permission from elsewhere, but I'm not clear how I was involved in the process).

[Edited by stevef at 23:06, 19/4/2011]
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Jason Togneri Message #117402, posted by filecore at 07:48, 20/4/2011, in reply to message #117398

Posts: 3867
(That doesn't mean that you didn't get permission from elsewhere, but I'm not clear how I was involved in the process).
You were contacted. Permission was received. It's the reader's assumption that the two are connected. Probably just poor phrasing; it sounds like [lots of people] were contacted and [somebody] replied affirmatively.
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Andrew Rawnsley Message #117404, posted by arawnsley at 10:11, 20/4/2011, in reply to message #117398
R-Comp chap
Posts: 594
Sorry Steve, didn't mean to drag you into it. Was just trying to explain that I'd contacted several members of the NetSurf team. I also checked with Richard Wilson for (IIRC) Tinct?
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Steven Gregory Message #117405, posted by thecellartroll at 11:38, 20/4/2011, in reply to message #117404
Member
Posts: 135
OK folks, can we now assume that the licensing conditions have been met? If not it would be more professional for the parties involved to discuss it by email or by meeting by the bus shelter for a good old fashioned punch-up.

Now who's going to post a link to a nice video showing the ARMini in action?!
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Rob Kendrick Message #117406, posted by nunfetishist at 12:06, 20/4/2011, in reply to message #117404
nunfetishist
Today's phish is trout a la creme.

Posts: 522
Sorry Steve, didn't mean to drag you into it. Was just trying to explain that I'd contacted several members of the NetSurf team. I also checked with Richard Wilson for (IIRC) Tinct?
Tinct's licence requires the author's explicit consent to distribute with a commercial product. Its licence is ambiguous on the subject of if this permission is per-organisation or per-product. Which is even stricter than NetSurf's requirements (where you must do one of ship source with product, or ship a written note offering source with product. Which incidentally, you've not said you're doing either, only a bunch of other stuff.)
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Pages (2): |< < 2

The Icon Bar: General: ARMini people... Time to let the cat out of the bag!